Widest single scenario: S4
Developer Productivity with Claude spans 65% of the blueprint through D1, D2, D3 — more than any other scenario in the bank. Build this lab first.
CCAR-F · Claude Certified Architect – Foundations
CCAR-F is the only scenario-based exam of the four. It draws 4 of the 6 published scenarios, so what you actually get asked is decided by that draw. This is the map: which domains each scenario reaches, and how much of the blueprint each one spans.
Exam form
60 items
120 minutes — about 2.0 min per item.
Cut score
720 of 1000
Scaled 100–1000 from a standard-setting study. Nothing here predicts it.
Scenario draw
4 of 6 drawn
15 possible draws · ~15 items per scenario.
Draws covering all domains
14 of 15 93%
1 draw misses a domain entirely.
Item bank
30 of 30 statements at floor
Every statement has at least 3 items. 120 authored in total.
4 of the 6 scenarios are presented, which is exactly 15 possible draws. 14 of those 15 exercise all 5 domains (93%).
The only exception is {S1, S2, S3, S4}, which omits D4 — D4 is primary only in S5 and S6 ( Claude Code for Continuous Integration and Structured Data Extraction) . Skip those and you leave 20% of the exam unprepared.
D5 Context Management & Reliability carries the lowest weight (15%) but the widest scenario spread — primary in 4 of the 6 scenarios, and reachable through 15 of the 15 draws. Lowest weight is not lowest exposure.
Developer Productivity with Claude spans 65% of the blueprint through D1, D2, D3 — more than any other scenario in the bank. Build this lab first.
Prompt Engineering & Structured Output is worth 20% of the exam but is primary in only 2 scenarios ( S5, S6), so it is reachable through 14 of the 15 draws rather than all of them. That asymmetry is the trap: a low draw probability is not a low weight.
Ordered by weight spanned, so the top row is the highest-coverage lab. Domain columns carry the published weight and the item count a real form is expected to draw from that domain (60 items × weight).
| Scenario | D1 Agentic Architecture & Orchestration 27% ~16.2 items | D2 Tool Design & MCP Integration 18% ~10.8 items | D3 Claude Code Configuration & Workflows 20% ~12.0 items | D4 Prompt Engineering & Structured Output 20% ~12.0 items | D5 Context Management & Reliability 15% ~9.0 items | Weight spanned of 60 items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S4 Developer Productivity with Claude | D1 is primary for S4, 9 items authored | D2 is primary for S4, 6 items authored | D3 is primary for S4, 5 items authored | D4 is not primary for S4 | D5 is not primary for S4 | 65% |
| S1 Customer Support Resolution Agent | D1 is primary for S1, 9 items authored | D2 is primary for S1, 5 items authored | D3 is not primary for S1 | D4 is not primary for S1 | D5 is primary for S1, 6 items authored | 60% |
| S3 Multi-Agent Research System | D1 is primary for S3, 8 items authored | D2 is primary for S3, 6 items authored | D3 is not primary for S3 | D4 is not primary for S3 | D5 is primary for S3, 6 items authored | 60% |
| S5 Claude Code for Continuous Integration | D1 is not primary for S5 | D2 is not primary for S5 | D3 is primary for S5, 9 items authored | D4 is primary for S5, 11 items authored | D5 is not primary for S5 | 40% |
| S2 Code Generation with Claude Code | D1 is not primary for S2 | D2 is not primary for S2 | D3 is primary for S2, 12 items authored | D4 is not primary for S2 | D5 is primary for S2, 8 items authored | 35% |
| S6 Structured Data Extraction | D1 is not primary for S6 | D2 is not primary for S6 | D3 is not primary for S6 | D4 is primary for S6, 13 items authored | D5 is primary for S6, 7 items authored | 35% |
| Scenarios reaching this domain | 3 /6 | 3 /6 | 3 /6 | 2 /6 | 4 /6 | 4 of 6 drawn |
| Possible draws reaching this domain | 15 /15 | 15 /15 | 15 /15 | 14 /15 | 15 /15 | 15 draws |
Every number above is computed at build time from the published blueprint.yml for CCAR-F (guide v1.0). The possible-draw count is enumerated in code, not asserted, and the build fails if it disagrees with the published figure.