Domains

5 domains, 30 published task statements, 60 items on the paper. The item column is the blueprint weight applied to that item count — what a real form is expected to draw, not a promise about any one exam.

CCAR-F domains ordered by exam weight, with derived item counts, task statement counts, scenario reach, and current item-bank coverage.
Domain Weight Items of 60 Statements Items per statement Scenarios Draws reaching it In bank
D1 Agentic Architecture & Orchestration 27% 16.2 7 2.3 S1S3S4 3 of 6 15 /15 26
D3 Claude Code Configuration & Workflows 20% 12 6 2 S2S4S5 3 of 6 15 /15 26
D4 Prompt Engineering & Structured Output 20% 12 6 2 S5S6 2 of 6 14 /15 24
D2 Tool Design & MCP Integration 18% 10.8 5 2.2 S1S3S4 3 of 6 15 /15 17
D5 Context Management & Reliability 15% 9 6 1.5 thinnest S1S2S3S6 4 of 6 15 /15 27
Total 100% 60 30 6 in the bank 15 possible 120
D1 27% Agentic Architecture & Orchestration 7 task statements · 16.2 items · 3 of 6 scenarios D3 20% Claude Code Configuration & Workflows 6 task statements · 12 items · 3 of 6 scenarios D4 20% Prompt Engineering & Structured Output 6 task statements · 12 items · 2 of 6 scenarios D2 18% Tool Design & MCP Integration 5 task statements · 10.8 items · 3 of 6 scenarios D5 15% Context Management & Reliability 6 task statements · 9 items · 4 of 6 scenarios